Vote for Vuze!

ekstasee

My feedback

  1. 164 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ekstasee supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General » Utility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ekstasee commented  · 

    what about me! I run 1800= torrents and 8Tb of data. It'll take me 2 days to do a back-up. Get real!

  3. 383 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General » Torrenting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ekstasee commented  · 

    ihaveaname is spot-on with his/her assessment. Also, many sites no longer impose ratios and most people are unaware that there are a significant amount of privately funded and site funded seed-boxes with unlimited data allowance and Giga-bit bandwidths. They operate silently (not publicised) and you have no idea whether you are connected to them or a home-based single torrenter. The premise behind this suggestion has it merits in an appropriate context, but I don't consider this suggestion worthy of a high priority. jmo.

  4. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ekstasee commented  · 

    The only way two or more torrents could interfere with each other is they are assigned the same hash number and while that is not impossible, it would be highly improbable, given the algorithms being developed in todays world.

    this idea bears little merit!

  5. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ekstasee commented  · 

    Vuze already has a similar protocol available under "Tracker > Client" where you should tick "use different peer identities for track and data communication"

    and then in "Tracker > Server" remove tick from "send peer identity to downloaders"

    In both the "tracker" and "Server" you should tick "enable key passing to tracker for enhanced security"

  6. 169 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ekstasee supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ekstasee commented  · 

    I support this suggestion. Wish I'd thought of it!

When writing a new idea, please keep it clean and civil. Please limit yourself to one idea per entry. Entries containing multiple ideas confuse the voting proccess.

Visit the Vuze Development Blog to check out the progress of your ideas

Vuze is Open Source - can't wait for your feature to be implemented? Write it yourself! See the Vuze Wiki for an introduction to doing this and visit the Development Site for developer resources.

Feedback and Knowledge Base