ekstasee
My feedback
-
164 votes
ekstasee supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
383 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ekstasee commented
ihaveaname is spot-on with his/her assessment. Also, many sites no longer impose ratios and most people are unaware that there are a significant amount of privately funded and site funded seed-boxes with unlimited data allowance and Giga-bit bandwidths. They operate silently (not publicised) and you have no idea whether you are connected to them or a home-based single torrenter. The premise behind this suggestion has it merits in an appropriate context, but I don't consider this suggestion worthy of a high priority. jmo.
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ekstasee commented
The only way two or more torrents could interfere with each other is they are assigned the same hash number and while that is not impossible, it would be highly improbable, given the algorithms being developed in todays world.
this idea bears little merit!
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ekstasee commented
Vuze already has a similar protocol available under "Tracker > Client" where you should tick "use different peer identities for track and data communication"
and then in "Tracker > Server" remove tick from "send peer identity to downloaders"
In both the "tracker" and "Server" you should tick "enable key passing to tracker for enhanced security"
-
172 votes
ekstasee supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment ekstasee commented
I support this suggestion. Wish I'd thought of it!
what about me! I run 1800= torrents and 8Tb of data. It'll take me 2 days to do a back-up. Get real!